Initial Coin Offerings: A Primer and Suggestion of Impending Issues
This is the first of a three-part blog series. In this post, I will describe generally how an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) operates. Stay tuned for discussions in my second and third posts on how the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Internal Revenue Service might characterize and treat these ICOs.
What is this “blockchain technology” thing anyway?
To understand Initial Coin Offerings (“ICOs”) it is necessary to have at least a general understanding of how blockchain technology works. At a very general level, a blockchain network is a forum through which transactions are recognized and recorded in a decentralized, online community. The members of the blockchain network confirm the existence of a transaction on that network, and a ledger records each of those transactions in a chain of “blocks” — hence the name: “blockchain.”
Contrast blockchain with, for example, the traditional sale of a house, where value is transferred through a title company and is recorded by a governmental recorder of deeds. The blockchain community does not need a third-party title company through which funds are transferred or a third-party recorder of deeds to memorialize the transfer. Instead, the participants in the online blockchain community recognize that the transaction occurred, and a decentralized blockchain ledger records the transaction in a way that, theoretically, is permanent and unalterable. Every participant in the blockchain network has simultaneous access to the ledger and can observe, in close to real-time, transactions as they occur.
While virtual currency transactions are the most commonly thought of activities to occur using blockchain technology, the technology is pertinent to a host of other applications including – but certainly not limited to – real estate transactions, smart contracts (defining a contractual relationship using “if-then” business logic), and digital identity protection.
ICOs: Beyond Bitcoin
The process of building software applications based on blockchain technology is fundamentally no different than any other technology startup. These blockchain applications contemplate operating on a closed network (unlike the open network blockchains on which virtual currency is exchanged) through which the member participants observe and verify transactions. Consequently, in order to access the specific application blockchain network, a user must have entry as a participant.
Taking advantage of network exclusivity, some blockchain developers raise money to fund the development of their application by selling future rights to participate in the network. These developers issue a “utility coin” or “utility token” representing a future right to participate in the network in exchange for cash or virtual currency.
The most basic ICO grants the purchasers only a right to participate without conferring upon the purchaser any equity interest in the underlying software application. Moreover, even after selling coins or tokens, the developer might or might not have an obligation to actually produce an operational network.
ICOs raised more money in 2017 than early stage venture capital activity for internet companies. ICOs raised $1.2 billion (that’s not a typo, that’s billion with a “b”) in December 2017 alone. There have already been more than 35 ICOs in 2018. The trend continues to grow.
About Michelle Schwerin
Michelle F. Schwerin represents individuals and businesses in a variety of tax matters, including tax liability disputes, innocent spouse claims, claims for penalty abatement, refund claims and litigation, preparer and promoter penalty investigations and tax collection matters.
For more information about Michelle, please visit her profile.
The content on this post does not constitute legal advice, may be geographically or time sensitive, and is for informational purposes only. Any opinions expressed in this post are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. You should not act upon the information presented herein without seeking the advice of legal counsel. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.